This was my first Gruber's non-Johnny Fletcher book and I was curious if it would be more serious and not so tongue-in-cheek as the stuff in the Fletcher series (which, for the record, I absolutely love!). I didn't need to wait long for an answer.
Our hero Joe Devlin, an ex-hobo who just inherited a detective correspondence school (the institute!) from his eccentric uncle, is hired by some hillbilly to find his stolen overcoat. Offering him a fee ten times higher than he had paid for the old, stolen one. But since our man isn't a licensed detective, he hires one... who turns out to be an alcoholic... so Joe promptly hires another private eye to keep an eye on the first one. And guess what? This last one will be killed by yet another guy who shadowed all of them!
Welcome to Frank Gruber's wacky world! Cool stuff, a real page-turner. I loved it and couldn't stop smiling while reading it. But then, in the last third, it just falls apart.
After drinking with his new drinking detective buddy and (inevitably) stirring trouble and a fight in the bar, Joe abruptly departs Chicago on some wild goose chase that turns out to not be just an episode but instead takes a good chunk of the book. Unfortunately, it gradually becomes a snooze fest, with new characters needlessly thrown into the plot and some story developments that do little to develop the story. In short, and very bluntly - it turns into a mess. Even worse, most of the spark and playfulness of the first half fades away. It felt like chapter after chapter was used for padding and to reach the word count...
There are a few exceptions, the highlight being the hotel with night and day shift rooms, so our hero must share his room with another guest! Crazy and hilarious shit, I loved that one.
By the time it came to the final part - the mandatory big revelation act - I was pretty battle-fatigued and just wanted it to end. It didn't help much that it took Joe twenty pages to explain the plot and point out the culprit. Since this is a classic mystery, Gruber does his best to overcomplicate everything, and there are probably dozens of possible solutions to whodunnit in this one. So, the one used probably holds water, but it is just not very convincing. To put it mildly.
I'll give you just one example. Our guy didn't go on that goose chase for no reason. He went to that godforsaken place (see the location section of the facts below) with a very specific goal: to make sure there was a certain painting hanging on the wall of some pub, which would corroborate the statement of one of his suspects. You may be asking yourself why the fuck didn't he just pick up the phone, call the pub, and ask the bartender about it? And you would be asking the same question as I did myself...
Had it been trimmed for 50 or so pages, it could have been great. But this way, it's just all right. With due respect to Gruber, it's actually quite forgettable, to be honest...
3/5
Hero:
References: